Interview Thoughts 2: So Why & Where?
Well, in the second part of my interview thoughts
, I’m going to begin by discussing something which seems to make up the mainstay of most interviews: WHY?
Namely, why you and why are you interested in the profession? (Please note, I’m going to use parts of my usual cover letter in answering this).
Well, I’m interested in the communications industry (and particularly in advertising, as it happens) because it relates to what makes me tick generally – I like finding out about people; what makes them tick, why they react the way they do to stimuli, be it a bold picture of marketing communications, a Rorschach test, a celebrity or a clever piece of writing.
And indeed, the download
in my sidebar often helps when explaining to companies just why I think I’d be a good fit for the industry (or at least helps them realise just what makes me tick).
So anyway, people are the reason I want to work in this communications game. I like talking (as you will undoubtedly have noticed when you meet me – perhaps a little too much in the interview game, if I’m honest) and I like to write my thoughts down. It’s why I enjoy keeping this blog.
I realise in terms of life experiences I’m never ever going to be one of those people who have mastered 6 languages and lived abroad for a massive amount of years before returning to take up the mantle of the communications biz. No, I’m a 22 year old from Worcestershire, someone who loves music, reading and writing (the very three things Russell mentioned in his podcast
with Jon Steel that are things everyone says), as well as a host of other random interests. I’d also like to learn to play the guitar/piano at some point, if only to realise just how hard it is.
However, I think in terms of latent curiosity, enthusiasm and general appreciation of marketing communications, I can rival most candidates. Advertising plays to my strengths, and belief that the best communication messaging is always inherently simplistic, despite the rapidly changing communications mix.
My thoughts should be fairly clear (if you read the blog even vaguely) of where I think good communications lies, but in terms of the industry, I think the era of ‘Web 2.0’ has created a culture where any consumer can quickly publish their thoughts about a brand, putting them on a far greater platform to air their views. Indeed, as the Coke/Mentos YouTube videos demonstrate
, brand owners cannot easily control just how their products are utilised.
The power of conversation, of a dialogue with a consumer rather than a ‘top down’, dictatorial and enforced message is something which I feel strongly about. In this new communications era, I believe that the ability to generate conversations in order to engage with your consumer will be incredibly important. Indeed, what will continue to endure will be authenticity and storytelling; if you can’t do this, you are liable to be found out, as Sony found out here.
So, I think the why has been adequately explained. So WHERE do I see myself fitting into this new mix of communications?
Well, I’ll be quite honest with you; much as I dislike the term ‘creative generalist’, I do think there are elements of all of the 3 main agency outposts which I could do and would enjoy.
I like account handling in so much as the idea of being able to maintain a relationship with a client and helping to present the creative work greatly appeals to me. The administrative nature of this doesn’t massively appeal – but I’m willing to do it; hell, every modern day job has an element of this, right from a temp job to being the MD. I’d like a hand in the strategy though, and worry that the role of an account man has massively changed since the days of Frank Lowe, the Saatchi brothers and others, to simply not allow for much strategic thought.
Planning then; and seeing how I’ve been told by all and sundry in the industry that I’m a planner, I should be most inclined towards this. It is true, I like to think I’m a reasonable strategic thinker, and I love the idea of helping to write the creative brief, as well as mining insights from people and research. Yet, the prospect of being told to ‘justify the idea’ as I feel some planners are, doesn’t appeal in some ways. However, of all of the suggestions, it’s the one I lean the most strongly towards (especially given the fact that Russell
and many others seem to think so).
I’ll be honest, I’ve even thought about Copywriting. I think this crosses every English grad’s mind, and I like to think I can write well. It’s more of a pipe dream to be honest – I don’t think I could come up with enough original ideas; sure would be fun to try and crack the odd creative brief.
So yes, out of all of those, I’d be a Planner, first and foremost. Where in the world? Well, I’d like to learn my trade in this country, then move further afield when I know what I’m doing.
What would you do readers, and what are your thoughts?